Nexus StandardsHumanitarian Action and DevelopmentAudiences
Area · proposed

For humanitarian and public-sector practitioners

The humanitarian and public-sector entry section of the Humanitarian Action and Development subsite is written for emergency managers, humanitarian information officers and public-service practitioners: it walks through the CAP and WIS 2.0 packages, the alert console in the sandbox, and the HXL and IATI packages, and shows how operational records stay interoperable and responsible under data-protection rules. Every artifact of the area carries a UNI (Unique Nexus Identifier), which identifies and never certifies.

Area recordHumanitarian Action and Development
  1. TierAudiences
  2. Registryproposed area · no registry row yet
  3. Nexus StandardsNS-0, NS-3, NS-10, NS-11
  4. Open standards5
  5. Feeds4 · 0 admitted
  6. Couplings4
  7. Last reviewed2026-10-17

Context entry PROPOSED for the Nexus Standards registry.

UNI
requested · not yet allocated
Status
PROPOSEDproposed area · no registry row yet
Last reviewed
area context bank
Cite this page

Nexus Standards (2026). For humanitarian and public-sector practitioners: area brief, Humanitarian Action and Development (PROPOSED). https://nexustandards.com/humanitarian/for-humanitarian-and-public-sector/. Last reviewed 2026-10-17.

Download the profile

Files carry the credits and the licence line; they are generated in your browser and nothing is sent. Downloads need script.

01Scope

For humanitarian and public-sector practitioners: what the area covers, and what it leaves to others.

The audiences section of Humanitarian Action and Development. Scope as the area context entry states it (PROPOSED).

In scope 5

  • A path through CAP and WIS 2.0 packages, the alert console in the sandbox and HXL and IATI packages
  • How to tag operational data with HXL and publish funding in IATI
  • Data-responsibility clauses for sensitive data
  • How warning records carry timing and provenance
  • How to report Sendai indicators from operational records

Out of scope 3

  • Operational decisions or warnings to the public
  • Personal data handling advice beyond the cited guidance
  • Agency performance evaluation

Jurisdictions No jurisdiction note is recorded for this area yet; jurisdiction narrows what applies and never implies that a Nexus profile satisfies a law.

02Entry point

Where humanitarian and public sector start in the registry.

External standards

52 external standards named for these domains.

Names of standards bodies and their standards belong to their stewards and are used only to identify the documents; no text of an external standard is reproduced here.

StandardBodyRelationAccess
ISO 22322:2022 Security and resilience - Emergency management - Guidelines for public warningISO/TC 292compatibility profile (restricted)paywalled
ISO 22395:2018 Security and resilience - Community resilience - Guidelines for supporting vulnerable persons in an emergencyISO/TC 292citepaywalled
ISO 22396:2020 Security and resilience - Community resilience - Guidelines for information exchange between organizationsISO/TC 292citepaywalled
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection - Information security management systems - RequirementsISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 27compatibility profile (restricted)paywalled
ISO/IEC 27005:2022 Guidance on managing information security risksISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 27citepaywalled
ISO/IEC 27701:2025 Privacy information management systemsISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 27citepaywalled
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 (NIST CSWP 29)NISTcrosswalkopen
NIST SP 800-37 Rev. 2 Risk Management Framework for Information Systems and OrganizationsNISTciteopen
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 Security and Privacy Controls for Information Systems and OrganizationsNISTcrosswalkopen
NIST Open Security Controls Assessment Language (OSCAL)NISTadoptopen
OASIS STIX Version 2.1 (Structured Threat Information Expression)OASIS Cyber Threat Intelligence TCciteopen
OASIS TAXII Version 2.1 (Trusted Automated Exchange of Intelligence Information)OASIS Cyber Threat Intelligence TCciteopen
Common Vulnerability Scoring System v4.0FIRST CVSS Special Interest Groupciteopen
Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030UN Member States (Third UN World Conference on DRR); UNDRR custodiancrosswalkopen
Sendai Framework Monitor (38 indicators)UNDRRcrosswalkopen
UNDRR-ISC Hazard Information Profiles (HIPs)UNDRR and International Science Counciladoptopen
Early Warnings for All initiative and Executive Action Plan 2023-2027WMO, UNDRR, ITU, IFRC (co-leads)crosswalkopen
OASIS Common Alerting Protocol Version 1.2OASIS Emergency Management TCadoptopen
ITU-T Recommendation X.1303 bis Common alerting protocol (CAP 1.2)ITU-Tciteunknown
WMO Register of Alerting Authorities and CAP alert aggregationWMOadoptopen
WMO Cataloguing of Hazardous Events (WMO-CHE)WMO (adopted by Congress 2019)crosswalkopen
WMO Global Multi-hazard Alert System (GMAS)WMOciteopen
DELTA Resilience (Disaster and Hazardous Events, Losses and Damages Tracking and Analysis)UNDRR, UNDP and WMOcrosswalkopen
OASIS Emergency Data Exchange Language (EDXL) Distribution Element Version 2.0OASIS Emergency Management TCciteopen
OASIS EDXL Situation Reporting (EDXL-SitRep) Version 1.0OASIS Emergency Management TCciteopen
INFORM Risk Index - Concept and MethodologyEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre with the Inter-Agency Standing Committeeprofileopen
The Sphere Handbook - Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian ResponseSphere Associationciteopen
Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS)CHS Alliance, Groupe URD and Sphereciteopen
Humanitarian Exchange Language (HXL) 1.1HXL Working Group (UN OCHA Centre for Humanitarian Data)adoptopen
IATI StandardInternational Aid Transparency Initiativecrosswalkopen
IASC Operational Guidance on Data Responsibility in Humanitarian ActionInter-Agency Standing Committee (Data Responsibility Working Group)citeopen
WHO International Health Regulations (2005) with 2024 amendmentsWorld Health Organization (World Health Assembly)citeopen
WHO Joint External Evaluation tool: International Health Regulations (2005) - third editionWorld Health Organizationcrosswalkopen
One Health approach and the Quadripartite One Health Joint Plan of ActionWHO, FAO, UNEP, WOAHciteopen
ISO 35001:2019 Biorisk management for laboratories and other related organisationsISO/TC 212compatibility profile (restricted)paywalled
WHO Laboratory Biosafety Manual, fourth editionWHOciteopen
WHO Global guidance framework for the responsible use of the life sciencesWHOciteopen
FIPS 203 Module-Lattice-Based Key-Encapsulation Mechanism StandardNISTadoptopen
FIPS 204 Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature StandardNISTadoptopen
FIPS 205 Stateless Hash-Based Digital Signature StandardNISTadoptopen

12 more in the crosswalk pages of the areas above.

Tools

Tooling and records this audience uses.

Implementation status per consumer, not readiness or certification.

ConsumerRoleThis audience's standards
nexus-foundryruntime (Foundry server, rooms, passports, GRIx fabric) and catalog for the system, organisation, LEG, GOV and PRG scopesNS-1 planned (wired on a branch not yet merged, #3043) · NS-9 planned (wired on a branch not yet merged, #3043) · NS-10 planned (wired on a branch not yet merged, #3043) · NS-11 planned (wired on a branch not yet merged, #3043)
nexus-foundry-wordpress-plugineditorial and institutional sites (GCRI Canada, GRF, GRA subsites; therisk.global Nexus Registry)NS-1 planned (wired on a branch not yet merged, #3043)
RecordTitleStatus
NXS-STD-ST-000001Nexus Standards NS-1 - the UNI and artifact catalogdraft
NXS-STD-SW-000001UNI runtime library (TypeScript, nexus-foundry consumer implementation)draft
NXS-STD-SW-000002UNI command-line tool (validate, parse, next, mint, catalog, export) - reference implementationdraft
NXS-STD-SC-000001UNI artifact record schema v1draft
NXS-STD-SW-000003UNI crosswalk exports (Zenodo, DataCite, Schema.org, CodeMeta, CITATION.cff) - nexus-foundry consumer implementationdraft
NXS-STD-SW-000004Zenodo deposit client (sandbox default, dry-run default, legal gate) - nexus-foundry consumer implementationdraft
NXS-STD-ST-000002Open-standards and open-source stack under the UNIdraft
NXS-STD-SW-000005UNI data profile (STAC, DCAT, PROV-O crosswalks) - standard text here, nexus-foundry consumer implementationdraft
NXS-STD-ST-000003Nexus Standards NS-3 - GRIx record UNIs (grammar, legacy crosswalk, allocation authority)draft
NXS-STD-ST-000005Nexus Standards NS-9 - contextual UNIs (deployments, instances, programme instances)draft

Resources and tooling

Pathways

Readiness pathways that read this evidence.

Each institution decides under its own rules; no pathway is an approval.

Recognition pathway

Recognition pathway, The Global Risks Forum (GRF)

What an institution, programme or deployment must evidence for GRF recognition records; records, not reputation. Open the pathway

GCRI Canada pathway

GCRI Canada evidence pathway

What a project, dataset or model must carry to be admissible evidence in the GCRI Canada research and intelligence pipelines. Open the pathway

03Audiences

Who works with this area: 4 audiences.

  1. Emergency managers
  2. Humanitarian information officers
  3. Local government practitioners
  4. NGO programme staff
05Nexus Standards that apply

4 Nexus Standards for this area.

The Nexus Standards the area context entry lists. Every one is proposed or specified; none is adopted by an authority.

  1. 01

    NS-0 · Constitution and principles

    Status proposed · 12 rules stated. Read NS-0

  2. 02

    NS-3 · GRIx record UNIs (grammar, legacy crosswalk, allocation authority)

    Status proposed · 0 rules stated. Read NS-3

  3. 03

    NS-10 · Policies and clauses (machine-readable obligations, enforcement in commons and command rooms)

    Status proposed · 7 rules stated. Read NS-10

  4. 04

    NS-11 · Verification and monitoring (evidence, attestations, zero-trust conformance observation)

    Status proposed · 6 rules stated. Read NS-11

06Open standards

5 open standards, each with its relation.

Relations are register entries (NS-14), never conformance or equivalence statements; hover or focus a relation for its meaning. Names of standards bodies and their standards belong to their stewards and are used only to identify the documents; no text of an external standard is reproduced here.

07Systemic couplings

4 couplings to other areas and subsites.

Each coupling names the mechanism that links this area to another; select a card on the canvas to trace it. Mechanisms are stated in the context bank (PROPOSED).

Canvas · the area and its couplingsDesign, not a record
For humanitarian and public-sector practitioners: systemic couplingsThe couplings the area context bank records for For humanitarian and public-sector practitioners: 1 area in Humanitarian Action and Development, 3 areas in other subsites and 3 subsites reached. Each coupling carries a mechanism stated in the context bank (PROPOSED); a reading aid, not a dependency proof.

Fig.RUNNING marks the area you are reading; DONE an area in the same subsite, QUEUED an area elsewhere and GATE a subsite reached. Tags give reading order only, never a status. Design, not a record.

  1. Humanitarian and civil societyHumanitarian Action and DevelopmentThe humanitarian sector area profiles needs, funding and trigger records this path uses.
  2. Public sector and governmentGovernance, Security and SocietyPublic-sector practitioners work with loss databases and strategies profiled there.
  3. Early warning and anticipatory actionEarly Warning and Anticipatory ActionThe Early Warning and Anticipatory Action subsite holds the alerting packages and sandbox console.
  4. Defence and civil protectionHazards and Disaster Risk ReductionCivil protection practitioners share incident and evacuation records.
08Readiness

What each pathway can read from this area.

GCRI Canada evidence pathway

GCRI Canada

Practitioners learn which operational and warning records GCRI Canada can read as evidence, with GCRI Canada deciding admissibility.

Open the GCRI Canada evidence pathway

Recognition pathway

The Global Risks Forum (GRF)

Practitioners see how a programme's protocols and attestations form a trail GRF may consider under its own rules.

Open the Recognition pathway

Capital pathway

The Global Risks Alliance (GRA)

Practitioners see how anticipatory finance can present verified trigger histories to GRA, which decides capital readiness; no approval is implied.

Open the Capital pathway

Each institution decides under its own rules what it reads as evidence; no pathway is an approval, a readiness statement or investment advice.

09Data and feeds

4 sources, with provider, licence and delivery path.

Sources the area reads or proposes. Delivery follows GRIx first; a source is shown live only after an owner decision admits it for public pages.

Every feed · pending admission

No legal register row admits any of these sources for live display on public pages yet, so nothing is read from them here. A register row that exists records the source for the governed GRIx path; admission for public pages is a separate owner decision.

Admitted
0
none yet
Register row exists
2
recorded for the GRIx path
Proposed row
2
terms to be recorded
Delivery
2 GRIx · 0 plugin · 0 browser · 2 snapshot
GRIx first, then plugin, browser-direct, snapshot
  • GDACS disaster alerts (API, RSS, CAP)pending admission

    European Commission JRC and UN OCHA · near real time

    European Commission reuse policy (CC BY 4.0) via GDACS terms

    GRIx governed readregister row exists

  • WMO Alert Hub and Register of Alerting Authoritiespending admission

    World Meteorological Organization · real time

    WMO Unified Data Policy plus each alerting authority's terms

    GRIx governed readregister row exists

  • Humanitarian Data Exchangepending admission

    UN OCHA Centre for Humanitarian Data · continuous

    Per-dataset licences (CC BY, CC BY-IGO, ODbL and others)

    build-time snapshotproposed register row

  • IATI Datastorepending admission

    International Aid Transparency Initiative · daily

    Publishers' open licences as declared in the IATI Registry

    build-time snapshotproposed register row

11Working group

The working-group charter, proposed.

Scope

Curate the practitioner learning path and the sandbox alert scenarios.

No working group is chartered yet; a community may charter this one under NS-13 through a docket.

Deliverables · 3
  1. Practitioner learning path with the CAP package as worked example
  2. Sandbox alert scenarios on simulated data
  3. Data-responsibility clause explainer
Liaison targets · 4
  • OCHA Centre for Humanitarian Data liaison sought
  • WMO liaison sought
  • IFRC liaison sought
  • OASIS Emergency Management TC liaison sought
12Open problems

3 open problems an expert would start with.

  1. Practitioners have little time and connectivity in crises, so materials must work offline and in many languages.
  2. Operational data are often sensitive, which limits worked examples to simulated data.
  3. Warning systems vary by country and agency, so one sandbox cannot represent all.
13Restricted compatibility profiles

No closed standard is named for this area.

Closed or paywalled standards appear by name and link only; any compatibility profile of one is built on simulated data and kept on protected pages until an institutional arrangement with the issuing body is recorded. Nexus Standards is not affiliated with, endorsed by or certified by any standards body named here.

The working group may name closed standards later; they would be listed here by name and link only.

14Hazards and sectors

What acts on this area, and who carries it.

Hazards and threats 0

No hazard or threat is listed for this area; it reads the hazards of the areas it couples with.

Sectors 0

No sector is listed for this area; it serves every sector through the areas it couples with.

15References

3 sourced references.

Peer-reviewed sources and published statistics on the publishers' own domains, as the context entry cites them.

16Learning

Risk Academy faculties for this area.

Plain links to the faculty pages of Risk Academy; no course, credential, recognition or endorsement is implied.

17Key terms

Terms used on this page.

UNI
Unique Nexus Identifier: identifies and resolves an artifact and its record; it never certifies truth, readiness or approval.
PROPOSED
Drafted content that no authority has adopted. Every area entry here is a proposal to the Nexus Standards registry.
adopt
Relation: the external standard is used as published, values validated against it.
crosswalk
Relation: Nexus clauses are mapped to parts of the external standard by number, never by text.
cite
Relation: the external standard is cited by identifier and URL as a reference.
pending admission
No legal register row admits this source for display on public pages yet, so nothing is read from it.
GRIx
The governed data layer of Nexus Foundry: external data is read through it with its licence and source release.
docket
A public change record under NS-13, decided by editors with written reasons.
attestation
An evaluator's recorded result for one clause and one subject under NS-11; never a certification.
liaison sought
A liaison the working group would ask the body for; none is held unless the body confirms it in writing.
19Learn and apply

Where For humanitarian and public-sector practitioners is taught, worked on and run.

Risk Academy disciplines that teach For humanitarian and public-sector practitioners, with their courses; the GCRI Canada, The Global Risks Forum (GRF) and The Global Risks Alliance (GRA) subsites that carry those disciplines; and the Nexus Foundry systems the standards name. Mappings are proposed for review (Risk Academy standards map, 2026-10-17); a link says a page on the same subject exists, never an endorsement or a conformance statement; framework names in course titles are named and linked, never reproduced.

Risk Academy

Disciplines and courses

20Questions

Questions and answers.

Is the For humanitarian and public-sector practitioners area adopted?
No. The area entry is PROPOSED content for the Nexus Standards registry; there is no registry row yet. Adoption of any standard is a recorded authority decision and none is recorded today.
Are the feeds on this page live?
No. Every feed is pending admission: no legal register row admits it for public pages yet, so nothing is read from it here.
How do I change this brief?
Through a docket under NS-13: a pull request against the area context bank or the registry, decided by editors with written reasons.
Nexus Standards

Shape this brief: For humanitarian and public-sector practitioners.

Propose a change, join the working group or name a source. Area entries are PROPOSED content for the Nexus Standards registry; a UNI identifies and never certifies, and nothing on this site is a certification, an approval or a readiness statement.

Nexus Standards documents CC BY 4.0 · tooling Apache-2.0 · counsel review pending (DEC-2026-10-16-NEXUS-STANDARDS-OPEN-LICENCE). External standards are named and linked under their own licences; a UNI (Unique Nexus Identifier) identifies, it never certifies. · Generated from the Nexus Standards corpus at commit 437ae044c5cb (2026-10-17); proposed and open.

Skip to toolbar