Nexus Standards · Foundations and Governance · Foundations
Area · proposed
Explains how closed and paywalled standards (for example ISO 31000, ISO 22301 and ISO/IEC 27001) are related to Nexus artifacts without reproducing them: named-only references by clause number and URL, profiles exercised only on synthetic example data, held on access-controlled pages and carrying a not-affiliated notice, and activated publicly only after an arrangement with the issuing body is recorded as an executed obligation. Each artifact of the area carries a UNI (Unique Nexus Identifier).
Nexus Standards (2026). Compatibility profiles for closed standards: area brief, Foundations and Governance programme. Proposed. https://nexustandards.com/foundations/compatibility-profiles/. Last reviewed 17 October 2026.
Files include the credits and the licence statement and are generated in the browser; no data is transmitted. Downloads require JavaScript.
An area of the Foundations and Governance programme (foundations). The area profile sets out 5 matters in scope and 3 matters addressed by other areas.
In scope 5
Out of scope 3
Jurisdictions Application in each jurisdiction is a national decision, taken by the National Standards Council (NSC) with the competent national authorities.
The map frames Latin America and the Caribbean as an example geography for compatibility profiles for closed; the frame gives context and is not a statement of where the standards apply. Shown at first: population density, 2020 (Gridded Population of the World v4.11, NASA SEDAC, CIESIN, Columbia University) and night-time lights, daily (VIIRS Black Marble, VNP46A2, NASA LAADS DAAC). The layer drawer adds flood water, 3-day composite (VIIRS Global Flood Product); active fires and thermal anomalies, last day (VIIRS NOAA-20 375 m, FIRMS); and true colour (VIIRS NOAA-20 corrected reflectance). NASA products are served through NASA GIBS under NASA's open data policy, with acknowledgement; population density is GPW v4.11 by CIESIN, Columbia University, under CC BY 4.0; coastlines, boundaries and place names come from NASA GIBS reference layers (© OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL) and Natural Earth (public domain). Each layer shows its own observation date; full credits are given under the map. Other sources of the profile, such as NIST OSCAL content (SP 800-53 Rev. 5 catalogue in OSCAL JSON) and NIST National Vulnerability Database APIs (open data for simulated control exercises), are listed for reference.
The interactive map needs JavaScript; the layer list and sources are below.
Layers 2
People and hazards
Keyboard, with the map focused
Hold Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom
Latest available
NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Natural Earth
Loading the latest NASA imagery.
Drag to move. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll, pinch or the buttons to zoom; hover for the values under the pointer; reset returns to the region.
Where people live, night-time lights and the floods and fires public institutions answer to, framed on Latin America and the Caribbean.Satellite and model products as NASA publishes them, each with its own date; indicators, not assessments of any place.
Layers and dates
An external standard enters the register with its body, version, link and relation; crosswalk rows cite external clauses by number; a claim of relation exists only through a clause set that cites the standard and is evaluated; the claim is displayed with its attestation results, names and marks stay with their stewards, and no claim of compliance or certification is made except by quoting an authority decision. 7 operations in 5 phases, built from the area profile: the cards carry its own data sources, indicators, open standards, couplings and, where listed, hazards, and each operation names the Nexus rules it implements (7). Records and artifacts are cited by UNI (Unique Nexus Identifier) and version.
Register entry start · Register
A superseded external version is kept with its successor noted.
Relation decision · Relation
Each relation has its own evidence: a link, a validator run, a crosswalk table, value validation, an extension clause or a gap statement.
Crosswalk rows step · Relation
Each row maps an external element to a Nexus clause or record field.
Clause set model · Clauses
Each clause carries derivedFrom with the external identifier and clause number.
Evaluate exercise · Evaluation
Current results are counted per clause set.
Claim display record · Display
The claim states what was evaluated and when, never an equivalence.
Names and marks end · Display
Pages that list crosswalks carry the notice that names and standards belong to their stewards.
Fig.Phases read left to right; each card names the operation, its actor and the record it leaves, and each edge label names the hand-over. Play, step or scrub; the detail panel gives the full text of the selected operation. Sources: NIST Online Informative References (OLIR) programme · Open Security Controls Assessment Language (OSCAL) · NS-14: Conformance and crosswalk to external standards · NS-10: Policies and clauses.
The standards architecture of this context, from the foundation standards to the open standards referenced (grouped by type of relation) and the services and data sources that build on them.
The interactive view requires JavaScript; the sections below present the same records.
The area profile lists 2 Nexus Standards. Each is a proposed standard under development.
Status: proposed · 7 requirements stated. Read NS-10
Status: proposed · 6 requirements stated. Read NS-11
A system model of this area built from the registry: 5 systems, 3 sectors, 8 controls, 2 feeds, 1 indicator. Select the components to include, choose an initiating hazard and run the scenario. Stress propagates through the hazard relations of the Nexus Hazard Standard (NHS-1), the exposure of each system, the recorded couplings and the sectors that carry the loss; adopted standards dampen transmission and live data sources support detection. All parameters are stated assumptions that the reader can adjust; results are illustrative scenario outputs for exercises and training, not forecasts or risk assessments.
Systems and couplings
Controls
NS-10 Policies and clauses (machine-readable obligations: definition, binding, evaluation and enforcement)NS-11 Verification and monitoring (evidence, attestations, zero-trust conformance observation)NRS-H56 Hazard family: Conflict-induced harm (NHS-1 soc.conflict-induced)NRS-H97 Hazard family: AI misuse and capability uplift (NHS-1 tech.ai-misuse)NRS-H23 Hazard family: Impacts and orbital hazards (NHS-1 space.orbital)NRS-H31 Hazard family: Persistent and bioaccumulative substances (NHS-1 poll.persistent)NRS-H36 Hazard family: Vaccine-preventable outbreaks (NHS-1 health.vaccine-preventable)NRS-H103 Hazard family: Neurotechnology, human enhancement and extended reality (NHS-1 tech.neuro-enhancement)Observation
4 couplings link this area to other areas and programmes, each with the mechanism of the link. Select a card on the diagram to trace a coupling.
Fig.The area at the left; coupled areas in the same programme, coupled areas in other programmes and the programmes reached to the right.
A proposed charter for this area, open to institutions and experts.
Maintain the profile method, synthetic example datasets, access rules and the activation procedure for each issuing body.
Institutions and experts are invited to charter this working group under NS-13 by filing a public change record. National Working Groups (NWGs) contribute national inputs and field exercises through their National Nexus Consortium (NNC).
Test suites, conformance statements and attestations for each standard, as recorded in the registry.
Available · draft in the browserCombine standards and clauses into a draft profile with citations, in YAML or JSON; nothing is submitted.
Each console computes from the registry and states its reasoning; decisions remain with the competent bodies.
4 open standards, each with its relation as recorded in the register under NS-14. Hover over or focus a relation for its definition.
3 questions identified as priorities for the working group.
What each institution of the ecosystem draws from this area: GCRI Canada, as Secretariat, for evidence; The Global Risks Forum (GRF) for recognition; and The Global Risks Alliance (GRA) for capital.
GCRI Canada decides under its own rules whether profile exercises on synthetic example data inform its evidence work; such exercises do not substitute for evidence about an actual institution.
The Global Risks Forum (GRF) determines whether to use profile pages in its dialogues; protected access implies no GRF role.
The Global Risks Alliance (GRA) decides capital readiness under its own criteria; a profile exercise is not an assessment of any member.
Each institution determines under its own rules what it accepts as evidence; a pathway reading is neither an approval nor investment advice.
The area profile identifies 3 user communities.
3 standards whose text is not openly available, named and linked only. Any compatibility profile is kept on protected pages until an arrangement with the issuing body is in place.
2 data sources named in the area profile, each with provider, licence, update frequency and delivery path.
Data sources are listed for reference; live data is displayed once licence review is complete.
NIST National Vulnerability Database APIs (open data for simulated control exercises)for reference
NIST · continuous
U.S. Government work (public domain in the United States)
governed data serviceproposed for the data register
NIST OSCAL content (SP 800-53 Rev. 5 catalogue in OSCAL JSON)for reference
NIST · on release
U.S. Government work (public domain in the United States)
build-time snapshotproposed for the data register
The area profile names 1 indicator, each with its framework and code.
Indicator names and codes are given as published by their stewards.
Hazards and threats 0
This area draws on the hazards of the areas it is coupled with.
Sectors 0
This area serves all sectors through the areas it is coupled with.
3 references from peer-reviewed and official publications cited in the area profile, linked at the publishers' own sites.
Recent peer-reviewed articles, preprints, datasets and reports on the subject of this area, retrieved at the time of reading from open scholarly metadata services (OpenAlex, Crossref, DataCite, Zenodo, arXiv, Europe PMC, OpenAIRE Graph) with search terms composed from the registry. Each work is listed with its authors, venue, year, type, open-access status and licence, and links to its DOI or landing page. Sources not yet enabled for live display on this site are listed for reference and are not queried.
Search termsstandards crosswalk; standards mapping; interoperability profile; NIST Cybersecurity FrameworkDerived from the title and scope of the area, the NHS-1 hazards it names and the open standards it lists.
No source is enabled for live display on this site yet: the sources are listed for reference and none is queried. Once the publisher of record enables a source after its terms are reviewed, recent works are listed here. Metadata and links only: title, authors, venue, year, type, open-access status and licence as each source records them; works are listed for orientation, not reviewed or endorsed.
2 courses and 4 disciplines of Risk Academy (risksacademy.com) that teach the knowledge and methods of this area. Each course lists its level, stream and learning hours.
The correspondence between courses, disciplines and the Nexus Standards is maintained with Risk Academy and is subject to its academic review.
GCRI Canada, The Global Risks Forum (GRF), The Global Risks Alliance (GRA) and Risk Academy work on the subject of this area in distinct roles (research and evidence; governance, policy and convening; capital, finance and markets; education and training). Each entry states why it corresponds and the step it offers; each institution sets its own terms of participation.
Research and evidence
GCRI Canada
Research programmes that produce the observations, models and assessments these records describe.
Systemic Risk ManagementDevelops enterprise and public risk practice, the management-system setting to which compatibility profiles relate records.Apply to this programme therisk.globalAll programmes of GCRI CanadaGovernance, policy and convening
The Global Risks Forum (GRF)
Tracks that convene public authorities, researchers and institutions on the governance of shared risks.
Governance NexusCompares organisational governance arrangements, the context in which management-system requirements are applied.Join this track globalriskforum.comAll tracks of The Global Risks ForumCapital, finance and markets
The Global Risks Alliance (GRA)
Industry programmes in which financial institutions build a shared understanding of systemic risk.
Financial Cyber and Operational ResilienceWorks on operational resilience testing and control frameworks across financial services.Join this programme globalriskalliance.comAll programmes of The Global Risks AllianceEducation and training
Risk Academy
Courses and disciplines that teach the knowledge and methods practitioners need to apply these standards.
Resilience Building 101RAF-102 · Introductory · 19.5 learning hoursConcepts, measures and investments that help people, infrastructure and organisations withstand and recover from shocksTake this course Clausecraft and LicensingRAT-202 · Intermediate · 20 learning hoursLicences, attribution, data-sharing agreements and risk-transfer clauses for risk tools, at a methods levelTake this course All courses and disciplinesListed in the education and training section of this pagePeer-reviewed articles, preprints, reports and datasets on the subject of this area, retrieved at the time of reading from open scholarly metadata services (OpenAlex and Crossref) and listed with authors, venue, year, type and access status, with a link to each work. Curated references and related standards are listed first; recent works matched by subject follow and are listed for orientation.
Search terms, derived from the title and scope of the area: standards crosswalk; standards mapping; interoperability profile. With JavaScript enabled, recent works matching these terms are listed from OpenAlex and Crossref.
Nexus Reports is the Consortium's quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.
Never send personal data, sensitive infrastructure detail or anything you have no right to share. A contribution is reviewed before use; sending it confers no authorship or editorial rights, and sponsorship never buys a finding.
Institutions and experts are invited to propose amendments, join the working group or propose data sources. National participation is organised through each country's National Nexus Consortium (NNC) and its National Working Groups (NWGs); competent national authorities are engaged through official channels.
Status and use. The Nexus Standards are proposed standards developed through an open process under NS-13 and published for voluntary use; they do not constitute certification, accreditation or regulatory approval, and adoption remains a decision of the Global Standards Council and, in each country, of its National Standards Council. A UNI (Unique Nexus Identifier) identifies an artifact; it does not certify it. Names of standards bodies and their standards belong to their stewards and are used only to identify the documents; no text of an external standard is reproduced here. Nexus Standards is not affiliated with, endorsed by or certified by any standards body named here.
Licences: CC BY 4.0 for standards text, registries, schemas and data; Apache-2.0 for reference code. External standards are cited by name, number and link under their own licences. Third-party data, libraries and fonts keep their own licences: see Third-party notices.