Nexus Standards · Foundations and Governance · Foundations
Area · proposed
Sets out the founding commitments every Nexus Standard inherits (NS-0): participation without a fee, consensus with recorded dissent, nominative use of other bodies' work, evidence over assertion, claims limited to what recorded evidence supports, and the nexus logic in which water, energy, food, health, biodiversity and climate risks are read as one evidence chain. This area of the Foundations and Governance programme sets the test against which every draft, profile and publication is assessed. Each artifact of the area carries a UNI (Unique Nexus Identifier).
Nexus Standards (2026). Constitution and principles: area brief, Foundations and Governance programme. Proposed. https://nexustandards.com/foundations/constitution-and-principles/. Last reviewed 17 October 2026.
Files include the credits and the licence statement and are generated in the browser; no data is transmitted. Downloads require JavaScript.
An area of the Foundations and Governance programme (foundations). The area profile sets out 5 matters in scope and 3 matters addressed by other areas.
In scope 5
Out of scope 3
Jurisdictions Application in each jurisdiction is a national decision, taken by the National Standards Council (NSC) with the competent national authorities.
The map is framed on the world as context for constitution and principles. Shown at first: population density, 2020 (Gridded Population of the World v4.11, NASA SEDAC, CIESIN, Columbia University) and night-time lights, daily (VIIRS Black Marble, VNP46A2, NASA LAADS DAAC). The layer drawer adds flood water, 3-day composite (VIIRS Global Flood Product); active fires and thermal anomalies, last day (VIIRS NOAA-20 375 m, FIRMS); and true colour (VIIRS NOAA-20 corrected reflectance). NASA products are served through NASA GIBS under NASA's open data policy, with acknowledgement; population density is GPW v4.11 by CIESIN, Columbia University, under CC BY 4.0; coastlines, boundaries and place names come from NASA GIBS reference layers (© OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL) and Natural Earth (public domain). Each layer shows its own observation date; full credits are given under the map. Other sources of the profile, such as OpenAlex works API (literature on standards governance and openness) and RFC Editor index and RSS feed of published RFCs (process documents cited by NS-0), are listed for reference.
The interactive map needs JavaScript; the layer list and sources are below.
Layers 2
People and hazards
Keyboard, with the map focused
Hold Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom
Latest available
NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Natural Earth
Loading the latest NASA imagery.
Drag to move. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll, pinch or the buttons to zoom; hover for the values under the pointer; reset returns to the region.
Where people live, night-time lights and the floods and fires public institutions answer to, framed on World.Satellite and model products as NASA publishes them, each with its own date; indicators, not assessments of any place.
Layers and dates
A consumer names the canonical repository and the versions it applies, uses the registries without forking them, runs the validator, resolves any conflict by the order of precedence, records its implementation status, carries the status fields on every record and submits its statement to verification under NS-11. 8 operations in 4 phases, built from the area profile: the cards carry its own data sources, indicators, open standards, couplings and, where listed, hazards, and each operation names the Nexus rules it implements (11). Records and artifacts are cited by UNI (Unique Nexus Identifier) and version.
Name the repository start · Declaration
The consumer states which repository it follows and which edition of each Nexus Standard it applies. Standards, registries, schemas and reference tools are published openly under recorded licences.
Use, never fork step · Declaration
Registries are copied with their digests and read as data. Data governs and prose explains, so a local change to a registry is a proposal under NS-13, not an edit.
Run the validator exercise · Validation
The repository validator checks identifiers, codes and records against the registries and schemas. A failing check is recorded with its reason.
Order of precedence decision · Validation
Where a standard conflicts with law, contract or the consumer's constitution, the conflict is recorded as a blocking record with a typed reason; it is never resolved silently in code.
Record the status record · Publication
Each standard the consumer applies is listed with its implementation status; a planned implementation reads as planned.
Carry status fields step · Publication
Each record states what it was derived from, who produced it, under which release and decision, and which corrections apply. A UNI identifies and resolves; it never certifies.
Independent check gate · Verification
The consumer's statement is checked against evidence by an evaluator that is not the consumer. Missing evidence, legal state or policy decision yields a typed refusal.
Consumer statement end · Verification
Conformance to NS-0 is the consumer's own statement, supported by attestations that anyone can check.
Fig.Phases read left to right; each card names the operation, its actor and the record it leaves, and each edge label names the hand-over. Play, step or scrub; the detail panel gives the full text of the selected operation. Sources: RFC 6852 Affirmation of the Modern Paradigm for Standards (OpenStand principles) · WTO TBT Committee Decision on principles for the development of international standards (six principles) · NS-0: Constitution and principles · NS-1: The UNI and the artifact catalog.
The standards architecture of this context, from the foundation standards to the open standards referenced (grouped by type of relation) and the services and data sources that build on them.
The interactive view requires JavaScript; the sections below present the same records.
The area profile lists 3 Nexus Standards. Each is a proposed standard under development.
Status: proposed · 10 requirements stated. Read NS-1
Status: proposed · 7 requirements stated. Read NS-10
Status: proposed · 6 requirements stated. Read NS-11
A system model of this area built from the registry: 5 systems, 4 sectors, 9 controls, 2 feeds, 2 indicators. Select the components to include, choose an initiating hazard and run the scenario. Stress propagates through the hazard relations of the Nexus Hazard Standard (NHS-1), the exposure of each system, the recorded couplings and the sectors that carry the loss; adopted standards dampen transmission and live data sources support detection. All parameters are stated assumptions that the reader can adjust; results are illustrative scenario outputs for exercises and training, not forecasts or risk assessments.
Systems and couplings
Controls
NS-1 The UNI and the artifact catalog (grammar v0.2: domain, sector, region and environment segments)NS-10 Policies and clauses (machine-readable obligations: definition, binding, evaluation and enforcement)NS-11 Verification and monitoring (evidence, attestations, zero-trust conformance observation)NRS-S1 System profile: NXS-CMD (Integrated posture and executive synthesis)NRS-S13 System profile: NXS-NSF (Trust, authorization and assurance)NRS-S2 System profile: NXS-NST (Civilian common operating picture)NRS-S3 System profile: NXS-DSS (Decision cases and deliberation)NRS-S4 System profile: NXS-COR (Compute, nodes and runtimes)NRS-S5 System profile: NXS-NXQ (Software, models and capability lifecycle)Observation
4 couplings link this area to other areas and programmes, each with the mechanism of the link. Select a card on the diagram to trace a coupling.
Fig.The area at the left; coupled areas in the same programme, coupled areas in other programmes and the programmes reached to the right.
A proposed charter for this area, open to institutions and experts.
Maintain NS-0, answer interpretation requests in writing and conduct the annual review of the principles in the light of experience on the standards track.
Institutions and experts are invited to charter this working group under NS-13 by filing a public change record. National Working Groups (NWGs) contribute national inputs and field exercises through their National Nexus Consortium (NNC).
4 open standards, each with its relation as recorded in the register under NS-14. Hover over or focus a relation for its definition.
adopt2
FAIR Guiding PrinciplesGO FAIRlisted in the register · fair-principlesOpen Definition 2.1Open Knowledge Foundationlisted in the register · open-definition-2-1cite2
RFC 6852 Affirmation of the Modern Paradigm for Standards (OpenStand principles)IETF / IAB (RFC Editor)listed in the register · openstand-rfc-6852WTO TBT Committee Decision on principles for the development of international standards (six principles)World Trade Organization TBT Committeeproposed for the registerSelect a sector, hazard family, capability and artifact type; the registry identifies the applicable standards and states the reasons.
Available · from the registryTest suites, conformance statements and attestations for each standard, as recorded in the registry.
Each console computes from the registry and states its reasoning; decisions remain with the competent bodies.
3 questions identified as priorities for the working group.
What each institution of the ecosystem draws from this area: GCRI Canada, as Secretariat, for evidence; The Global Risks Forum (GRF) for recognition; and The Global Risks Alliance (GRA) for capital.
GCRI Canada decides under its own evidence rules whether a record built to NS-0 is admissible as evidence; adherence to the principles is an input to that decision, not an approval.
The Global Risks Forum (GRF) decides recognition under its own programme rules; citing NS-0 makes a contribution's openness and accuracy commitments legible to that process and implies no recognition.
The Global Risks Alliance (GRA) decides capital readiness under its own criteria; NS-0 only makes the evidential basis of an artifact readable by its reviewers.
Each institution determines under its own rules what it accepts as evidence; a pathway reading is neither an approval nor investment advice.
The area profile identifies 4 user communities.
Standards whose text is not openly available are named and linked only. Any compatibility profile is kept on protected pages until an arrangement with the issuing body is in place.
The working group may identify restricted standards relevant to this area; they are listed here by name and link.
2 data sources named in the area profile, each with provider, licence, update frequency and delivery path.
Data sources are listed for reference; live data is displayed once licence review is complete.
OpenAlex works API (literature on standards governance and openness)for reference
OurResearch (OpenAlex) · daily
CC0 1.0
build-time snapshotproposed for the data register
RFC Editor index and RSS feed of published RFCs (process documents cited by NS-0)for reference
RFC Editor · on publication
IETF Trust Legal Provisions (RFC text freely available; code components BSD-3-Clause)
direct browser readproposed for the data register
The area profile names 2 indicators, each with its framework and code.
Indicator names and codes are given as published by their stewards.
Hazards and threats 0
This area draws on the hazards of the areas it is coupled with.
Sectors 0
This area serves all sectors through the areas it is coupled with.
4 references from peer-reviewed and official publications cited in the area profile, linked at the publishers' own sites.
Recent peer-reviewed articles, preprints, datasets and reports on the subject of this area, retrieved at the time of reading from open scholarly metadata services (OpenAlex, Crossref, DataCite, Zenodo, arXiv, Europe PMC, OpenAIRE Graph) with search terms composed from the registry. Each work is listed with its authors, venue, year, type, open-access status and licence, and links to its DOI or landing page. Sources not yet enabled for live display on this site are listed for reference and are not queried.
Search termsopen standards; FAIR principles; open science; standards governance; FAIR Guiding Principles; Open DefinitionDerived from the title and scope of the area, the NHS-1 hazards it names and the open standards it lists.
No source is enabled for live display on this site yet: the sources are listed for reference and none is queried. Once the publisher of record enables a source after its terms are reviewed, recent works are listed here. Metadata and links only: title, authors, venue, year, type, open-access status and licence as each source records them; works are listed for orientation, not reviewed or endorsed.
2 courses and 5 disciplines of Risk Academy (risksacademy.com) that teach the knowledge and methods of this area. Each course lists its level, stream and learning hours.
The correspondence between courses, disciplines and the Nexus Standards is maintained with Risk Academy and is subject to its academic review.
GCRI Canada, The Global Risks Forum (GRF), The Global Risks Alliance (GRA) and Risk Academy work on the subject of this area in distinct roles (research and evidence; governance, policy and convening; capital, finance and markets; education and training). Each entry states why it corresponds and the step it offers; each institution sets its own terms of participation.
Research and evidence
GCRI Canada
Research programmes that produce the observations, models and assessments these records describe.
Nexus RegistryKeeps records of what was decided, by whom and under what authority, the accountability the principles require.Apply to this programme therisk.globalAll programmes of GCRI CanadaGovernance, policy and convening
The Global Risks Forum (GRF)
Tracks that convene public authorities, researchers and institutions on the governance of shared risks.
Governance NexusExamines anti-capture and integrity arrangements, the safeguards behind consensus with recorded dissent.Join this track Research NexusWorks on research integrity and evidence interpretation, the basis of the principle of evidence over assertion.Join this track globalriskforum.comAll tracks of The Global Risks ForumCapital, finance and markets
The Global Risks Alliance (GRA)
Industry programmes in which financial institutions build a shared understanding of systemic risk.
Financial Regulation NexusCompares regulatory and supervisory frameworks, the context in which supervised institutions read voluntary standards.Join this programme globalriskalliance.comAll programmes of The Global Risks AllianceEducation and training
Risk Academy
Courses and disciplines that teach the knowledge and methods practitioners need to apply these standards.
Science Policy 101RAF-103 · Introductory · 19.5 learning hoursBringing evidence on risk to decision makers honestly, clearly and usefullyTake this course Policy and GovernanceRAN-307 · Intermediate · 21.5 learning hoursHow institutions, laws and people decide about risk, and how to tell whether policy worksTake this course All courses and disciplinesListed in the education and training section of this pagePeer-reviewed articles, preprints, reports and datasets on the subject of this area, retrieved at the time of reading from open scholarly metadata services (OpenAlex and Crossref) and listed with authors, venue, year, type and access status, with a link to each work. Curated references and related standards are listed first; recent works matched by subject follow and are listed for orientation.
Search terms, derived from the title and scope of the area: open standards; FAIR principles; open science; standards governance. With JavaScript enabled, recent works matching these terms are listed from OpenAlex and Crossref.
Nexus Reports is the Consortium's quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.
Never send personal data, sensitive infrastructure detail or anything you have no right to share. A contribution is reviewed before use; sending it confers no authorship or editorial rights, and sponsorship never buys a finding.
Institutions and experts are invited to propose amendments, join the working group or propose data sources. National participation is organised through each country's National Nexus Consortium (NNC) and its National Working Groups (NWGs); competent national authorities are engaged through official channels.
Status and use. The Nexus Standards are proposed standards developed through an open process under NS-13 and published for voluntary use; they do not constitute certification, accreditation or regulatory approval, and adoption remains a decision of the Global Standards Council and, in each country, of its National Standards Council. A UNI (Unique Nexus Identifier) identifies an artifact; it does not certify it. Names of standards bodies and their standards belong to their stewards and are used only to identify the documents; no text of an external standard is reproduced here. Nexus Standards is not affiliated with, endorsed by or certified by any standards body named here.
Licences: CC BY 4.0 for standards text, registries, schemas and data; Apache-2.0 for reference code. External standards are cited by name, number and link under their own licences. Third-party data, libraries and fonts keep their own licences: see Third-party notices.