Nexus StandardsHazards and Disaster Risk ReductionHazard and threat families
Area · proposed

Compound and cascading hazard standards

Many of the most damaging disasters are compound or cascading: concurrent hazards, triggered secondary hazards and failures that propagate through infrastructure and economies, which single-hazard standards cannot represent. This section of the Hazards and disaster risk reduction subsite sets records for hazard interactions, triggering relationships, dependency graphs and cascade chains so that multi-hazard analysis can link events causally with stated confidence. Every artifact of the area carries a UNI (Unique Nexus Identifier), which identifies and never certifies.

UNI
requested · not yet allocated
Status
PROPOSEDproposed area · no registry row yet
Last reviewed
area context bank
Cite this page

Nexus Standards (2026). Compound and cascading hazard standards: area brief, Hazards and Disaster Risk Reduction (PROPOSED). https://nexustandards.com/hazards/compound-and-cascading-hazard-standards/. Last reviewed 2026-10-17.

Download the profile

Files carry the credits and the licence line; they are generated in your browser and nothing is sent. Downloads need script.

01Scope

Compound and cascading hazard standards: what the area covers, and what it leaves to others.

The hazard and threat families section of Hazards and Disaster Risk Reduction. Scope as the area context entry states it (PROPOSED).

In scope 5

  • Hazard interaction records (triggering, amplification, concurrence)
  • Cascade chain records linking events to impacts
  • Dependency graph records for infrastructure and services
  • Multi-hazard scenario records
  • Event linkage identifiers across catalogues

Out of scope 3

  • Single-hazard methods covered in sibling areas
  • Proprietary catastrophe models
  • Operational incident command

Jurisdictions No jurisdiction note is recorded for this area yet; jurisdiction narrows what applies and never implies that a Nexus profile satisfies a law.

02Hazards and sectors

What acts on this area, and who carries it.

Hazards and threats 5

Concurrent extremesTriggered hazard chainsNatech eventsInfrastructure cascadesHazard-conflict compounding

Sectors 4

Public sector and governmentFinance, insurance and capital marketsEnergy utilities and gridsHumanitarian and civil society
03Data and feeds

4 sources, with provider, licence and delivery path.

Sources the area reads or proposes. Delivery follows GRIx first; a source is shown live only after an owner decision admits it for public pages.

Every feed · pending admission

No legal register row admits any of these sources for live display on public pages yet, so nothing is read from them here. A register row that exists records the source for the governed GRIx path; admission for public pages is a separate owner decision.

Admitted
0
none yet
Register row exists
4
recorded for the GRIx path
Proposed row
0
terms to be recorded
Delivery
4 GRIx · 0 plugin · 0 browser · 0 snapshot
GRIx first, then plugin, browser-direct, snapshot
04Open standards

4 open standards, each with its relation.

Relations are register entries (NS-14), never conformance or equivalence statements; hover or focus a relation for its meaning. Names of standards bodies and their standards belong to their stewards and are used only to identify the documents; no text of an external standard is reproduced here.

05Systemic couplings

4 couplings to other areas and subsites.

Each coupling names the mechanism that links this area to another; select a card on the canvas to trace it. Mechanisms are stated in the context bank (PROPOSED).

Canvas · the area and its couplingsDesign, not a record
Compound and cascading hazard standards: systemic couplingsThe couplings the area context bank records for Compound and cascading hazard standards: 2 areas in Hazards and Disaster Risk Reduction, 2 areas in other subsites and 2 subsites reached. Each coupling carries a mechanism stated in the context bank (PROPOSED); a reading aid, not a dependency proof.

Fig.RUNNING marks the area you are reading; DONE an area in the same subsite, QUEUED an area elsewhere and GATE a subsite reached. Tags give reading order only, never a status. Design, not a record.

  1. Hydrometeorological hazard standardsHazards and Disaster Risk ReductionCompounding: concurrent heat and drought, or surge and river flood, raise impacts beyond each hazard alone.
  2. Geophysical hazard standardsHazards and Disaster Risk ReductionTriggering: earthquakes trigger landslides, tsunamis and fires.
  3. Critical infrastructure and critical entitiesEnergy and Critical InfrastructureCascade: failures propagate through interdependent networks.
  4. Global and systemic riskSystemic RisksMechanism: cascades across sectors are the core of systemic risk.
06Restricted compatibility profiles

No closed standard is named for this area.

Closed or paywalled standards appear by name and link only; any compatibility profile of one is built on simulated data and kept on protected pages until an institutional arrangement with the issuing body is recorded. Nexus Standards is not affiliated with, endorsed by or certified by any standards body named here.

The working group may name closed standards later; they would be listed here by name and link only.

07Indicators

2 indicators the area tracks.

Indicator names and codes as their stewards publish them; values appear only from a governed GRIx source, never typed into a page.

08Nexus Standards that apply

4 Nexus Standards for this area.

The Nexus Standards the area context entry lists. Every one is proposed or specified; none is adopted by an authority.

  1. 01

    NS-0 · Constitution and principles

    Status proposed · 12 rules stated. Read NS-0

  2. 02

    NS-3 · GRIx record UNIs (grammar, legacy crosswalk, allocation authority)

    Status proposed · 0 rules stated. Read NS-3

  3. 03

    NS-9 · Contextual UNIs (deployments, instances, programme instances)

    Status proposed · 5 rules stated. Read NS-9

  4. 04

    NS-11 · Verification and monitoring (evidence, attestations, zero-trust conformance observation)

    Status proposed · 6 rules stated. Read NS-11

10Readiness

What each pathway can read from this area.

GCRI Canada evidence pathway

GCRI Canada

GCRI Canada may admit cascade and interaction records that state causal evidence and confidence as research evidence; GCRI Canada decides under its own evidence and research rules, and no approval is implied.

Open the GCRI Canada evidence pathway

Recognition pathway

The Global Risks Forum (GRF)

GRF may record agencies adopting multi-hazard records as part of a Sendai multi-hazard dialogue; GRF decides under its own recognition rules, and no recognition or endorsement is implied.

Open the Recognition pathway

Capital pathway

The Global Risks Alliance (GRA)

GRA may read cascade scenarios with stated assumptions when it considers portfolio-level risk; GRA decides under its own capital-readiness rules, and no approval, rating or investment view is implied.

Open the Capital pathway

Each institution decides under its own rules what it reads as evidence; no pathway is an approval, a readiness statement or investment advice.

11Working group

The working-group charter, proposed.

Scope

Records for hazard interactions, cascades and dependencies that link single-hazard events causally.

No working group is chartered yet; a community may charter this one under NS-13 through a docket.

Deliverables · 3
  1. Hazard interaction vocabulary aligned to HIPs
  2. Cascade chain record with causal confidence
  3. Dependency graph schema
Liaison targets · 4
  • UNDRR liaison sought
  • International Science Council liaison sought
  • WMO liaison sought
  • Integrated Research on Disaster Risk programme liaison sought
12Open problems

3 open problems an expert would start with.

  1. Causal attribution of cascade steps is often inferred, not observed.
  2. Dependency data for infrastructure are confidential.
  3. Joint probability of compound extremes is poorly constrained by short records.
13Audiences

Who works with this area: 4 audiences.

  1. Multi-hazard risk modellers
  2. Civil protection planners
  3. Systemic risk researchers
  4. Infrastructure operators
14References

4 sourced references.

Peer-reviewed sources and published statistics on the publishers' own domains, as the context entry cites them. No Risk Academy faculty pathway is linked to this area yet; one is linked when a faculty publishes a pathway that fits.

  1. peer-reviewedA typology of compound weather and climate eventsNature Reviews Earth & Environment · 2020
  2. peer-reviewedFuture climate risk from compound eventsNature Climate Change · 2018
  3. peer-reviewedUnderstanding Compound, Interconnected, Interacting, and Cascading Risks: A Holistic FrameworkRisk Analysis · 2018
  4. peer-reviewedReviewing and visualizing the interactions of natural hazardsReviews of Geophysics · 2014
15Key terms

Terms used on this page.

UNI
Unique Nexus Identifier: identifies and resolves an artifact and its record; it never certifies truth, readiness or approval.
PROPOSED
Drafted content that no authority has adopted. Every area entry here is a proposal to the Nexus Standards registry.
adopt
Relation: the external standard is used as published, values validated against it.
crosswalk
Relation: Nexus clauses are mapped to parts of the external standard by number, never by text.
pending admission
No legal register row admits this source for display on public pages yet, so nothing is read from it.
GRIx
The governed data layer of Nexus Foundry: external data is read through it with its licence and source release.
docket
A public change record under NS-13, decided by editors with written reasons.
attestation
An evaluator's recorded result for one clause and one subject under NS-11; never a certification.
liaison sought
A liaison the working group would ask the body for; none is held unless the body confirms it in writing.
17Learn and apply

Where Compound and cascading hazard standards is taught, worked on and run.

Risk Academy disciplines that teach Compound and cascading hazard standards, with their courses; the GCRI Canada, The Global Risks Forum (GRF) and The Global Risks Alliance (GRA) subsites that carry those disciplines; and the Nexus Foundry systems the standards name. Mappings are proposed for review (Risk Academy standards map, 2026-10-17); a link says a page on the same subject exists, never an endorsement or a conformance statement; framework names in course titles are named and linked, never reproduced.

Risk Academy

Disciplines and courses

18Questions

Questions and answers.

Is the Compound and cascading hazard standards area adopted?
No. The area entry is PROPOSED content for the Nexus Standards registry; there is no registry row yet. Adoption of any standard is a recorded authority decision and none is recorded today.
Are the feeds on this page live?
No. Every feed is pending admission: no legal register row admits it for public pages yet, so nothing is read from it here.
How do I change this brief?
Through a docket under NS-13: a pull request against the area context bank or the registry, decided by editors with written reasons.
Nexus Standards

Shape this brief: Compound and cascading hazard standards.

Propose a change, join the working group or name a source. Area entries are PROPOSED content for the Nexus Standards registry; a UNI identifies and never certifies, and nothing on this site is a certification, an approval or a readiness statement.

Nexus Standards documents CC BY 4.0 · tooling Apache-2.0 · counsel review pending (DEC-2026-10-16-NEXUS-STANDARDS-OPEN-LICENCE). External standards are named and linked under their own licences; a UNI (Unique Nexus Identifier) identifies, it never certifies. · Generated from the Nexus Standards corpus at commit 437ae044c5cb (2026-10-17); proposed and open.

Skip to toolbar