Nexus StandardsCyber and digital risk standardsCrosswalk
Cyber and digital risk

Cyber and digital risk: crosswalk to external standards

The external standards in the crosswalk domains of cyber and digital risk, from the register, with the relation each has to the Nexus Standards; every row links the source body, and relations are evidenced by attestations with their own UNIs (Unique Nexus Identifier). Names of standards bodies and their standards belong to their stewards and are used only to identify the documents; no text of an external standard is reproduced here. Nexus Standards is not affiliated with, endorsed by or certified by any standards body named here.

Crosswalk graph · cyber and digital riskFrom the registry
Cyber and digital risk: the crosswalk86 nodes on four orbits (Nexus Standards and consumers inside, then domains, external standards and issuing bodies) joined by 128 register links.
Nexus StandardsDomainsExternal standardsIssuing bodiesConsumers

5 Nexus Standards · 5 domains · 50 external standards · 25 issuing bodies · 1 consumers. Relations are register entries (adopt, profile, crosswalk, cite), never compliance claims; names belong to their stewards.

Crosswalk graph86 nodes and 128 links from registry/external-standards.yaml, registry/subsites.yaml and registry/consumers.yaml. Relations (adopt, profile, crosswalk, cite) are register entries, never compliance claims.

01Security and cyber

Security and cyber: 16 entries.

StandardBodyVersionRelationAccessVerified
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection - Information security management systems - RequirementsISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 272022 (edition 3.0, 25 October 2022)compatibility profile (restricted)paywalledverified
ISO/IEC 27005:2022 Guidance on managing information security risksISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 272022 (replaces 2018 edition)citepaywalledverified
ISO/IEC 27701:2025 Privacy information management systemsISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 272025 (standalone edition; 2019 edition was an extension of 27001/27002)citepaywalledverified
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 (NIST CSWP 29)NIST2.0 (26 February 2024)crosswalkopenverified
NIST SP 800-37 Rev. 2 Risk Management Framework for Information Systems and OrganizationsNISTRevision 2citeopenunverified
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 Security and Privacy Controls for Information Systems and OrganizationsNISTRev. 5 (September 2020) with Release 5.2.0 (27 August 2025)crosswalkopenverified
NIST Open Security Controls Assessment Language (OSCAL)NIST1.1.x (1.1.2 confirmed in tooling; 1.1.3 UNVERIFIED)adoptopenverified
OASIS STIX Version 2.1 (Structured Threat Information Expression)OASIS Cyber Threat Intelligence TC2.1 (OASIS Standard, 10 June 2021)citeopenverified
OASIS TAXII Version 2.1 (Trusted Automated Exchange of Intelligence Information)OASIS Cyber Threat Intelligence TC2.1 (OASIS Standard, 10 June 2021)citeopenverified
Common Vulnerability Scoring System v4.0FIRST CVSS Special Interest Group4.0citeopenunverified
FIPS 203 Module-Lattice-Based Key-Encapsulation Mechanism StandardNIST2024adoptopenunverified
FIPS 204 Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature StandardNIST2024adoptopenunverified
FIPS 205 Stateless Hash-Based Digital Signature StandardNIST2024adoptopenunverified
IAEA Safety Standards (nuclear, radiation, transport and waste safety)International Atomic Energy Agencycurrentciteopenunverified
United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism StrategyUnited Nations General Assemblycurrentciteopenunverified
RFC 8032 Edwards-Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (EdDSA)IETF2017adoptopenunverified

Unverified entries rest on a secondary source for at least one field; the register says which.

02Canvas

Crosswalk evidence.

Canvas · crosswalk evidenceDesign, not a record
Cyber and digital risk: how a relation to an external standard is evidencedRegister entries for the area by domain and relation; NS-14 says what evidence each relation needs and how a claim may be displayed. Names and standards belong to their stewards.

Fig.Register relations for the area and the evidence NS-14 requires before a claim is displayed. Design, not a record.

03Zero trust and identity

Zero trust and identity: 3 entries.

StandardBodyVersionRelationAccessVerified
NIST SP 800-207 Zero Trust ArchitectureNISTFinal (11 August 2020)adoptopenverified
CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model Version 2.0CISA (US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency)2.0 (April 2023)profileopenverified
OAuth 2.0 (RFC 6749) and OpenID Connect Core 1.0IETF and OpenID FoundationRFC 6749 (2012); OpenID Connect Core 1.0adoptopenunverified

Unverified entries rest on a secondary source for at least one field; the register says which.

04Supply chains and logistics

Supply chains and logistics: 7 entries.

StandardBodyVersionRelationAccessVerified
ISO/IEC 27036-2:2022 Cybersecurity - Supplier relationships - Part 2: RequirementsISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 272022 (Part 1 2021, Part 3 2023, Part 4 cloud)citepaywalledverified
NIST SP 800-161 Rev. 1 Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management Practices for Systems and OrganizationsNISTRev. 1 (May 2022), Update 1 (1 November 2024)citeopenverified
OASIS Common Security Advisory Framework (CSAF) Version 2.0OASIS CSAF TC2.0 (OASIS Standard, November 2022)citeopenverified
OpenVEX specificationOpenVEX community (OpenSSF project)draftciteopenunverified
Supply-chain Levels for Software Artifacts (SLSA)OpenSSF (Linux Foundation)1.1 (April 2025, Approved Specification); site states 1.2 is currentadoptopenverified
ISO 28000:2022 Security and resilience - Security management systemsISO/TC 2922022compatibility profile (restricted)paywalledunverified
WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global TradeWorld Customs Organization2021citeopenunverified

Unverified entries rest on a secondary source for at least one field; the register says which.

05Digital and AI regulation

Digital and AI regulation: 8 entries.

StandardBodyVersionRelationAccessVerified
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (Artificial Intelligence Act)European Parliament and Councilin force 1 August 2024; staged applicationcrosswalkopenverified
CEN-CENELEC JTC 21 harmonised standards in support of the EU AI Act (incl. prCEN/CLC/TR 18347)CEN-CENELEC JTC 21in development; EN 18286 reported at public enquiry (30 October 2025) and later approval by differing sourcescitepaywalledunverified
Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 (Cyber Resilience Act)European Parliament and Councilin force 10 December 2024; reporting obligations from 11 September 2026; main requirements 11 December 2027citeopenunverified
Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2)European Parliament and Counciltransposition deadline 17 October 2024citeopenunverified
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation)European Parliament and Council2016citeopenunverified
OECD Recommendation of the Council on Regulatory Policy and GovernanceOECD2012citeopenunverified
Universal Digital Public Infrastructure Safeguards FrameworkUN Office of the Secretary-General's Envoy on Technology and UNDP2024crosswalkopenunverified
United Nations Global Principles for Information IntegrityUnited Nations2024crosswalkopenunverified

Unverified entries rest on a secondary source for at least one field; the register says which.

06AI and models

AI and models: 16 entries.

StandardBodyVersionRelationAccessVerified
ISO/IEC 23894:2023 Information technology - Artificial intelligence - Guidance on risk managementISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 422023 (edition 1, February 2023)compatibility profile (restricted)paywalledverified
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial intelligence - Management systemISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 422023compatibility profile (restricted)paywalledunverified
ISO/IEC 42005:2025 AI system impact assessmentISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 422025 (28 May 2025 per secondary sources)citepaywalledunverified
NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0, NIST AI 100-1)NIST1.0 (26 January 2023)crosswalkopenverified
NIST AI 600-1 Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Generative Artificial Intelligence ProfileNISTFinal (July 2024)citeopenverified
IEEE 7000-2021 Standard Model Process for Addressing Ethical Concerns during System DesignIEEE Standards Association2021citepaywalledunverified
IEEE 7001-2021 Standard for Transparency of Autonomous SystemsIEEE Standards Association2021citepaywalledverified
IEEE 7010-2020 Recommended Practice for Assessing the Impact of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems on Human Well-BeingIEEE Standards Association2020citepaywalledunverified
Model Cards for Model ReportingMitchell et al. (FAT* 2019)2019 paper (arXiv 1810.03993)profileopenunverified
OECD AI PrinciplesOECD2024 updatecrosswalkopenunverified
UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial IntelligenceUNESCO2021crosswalkopenunverified
ISO/IEC 5338:2023 AI system life cycle processesISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 422023compatibility profile (restricted)paywalledunverified
ISO/IEC 5259 Data quality for analytics and machine learningISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 422024compatibility profile (restricted)paywalledunverified
ISO/IEC 24029 Assessment of the robustness of neural networksISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 422023citepaywalledunverified
ISO/IEC 25059:2023 Quality model for AI systemsISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 72023compatibility profile (restricted)paywalledunverified
Model Context Protocol specificationAgentic AI Foundation (Linux Foundation)2025-06-18profileopenunverified

Unverified entries rest on a secondary source for at least one field; the register says which.

07Relations

What each relation means and what evidences it.

RelationMeaningEvidence
citeThe Nexus Standard refers to the external standard as context.URL and identifier in the register.
profileThe Nexus Standard constrains or specialises an open external standard (STAC, DCAT, PROV-O, DataCite, CAP).Conformance tests against the external standard's own validator where one exists.
crosswalkElements of the external standard map to Nexus elements (clauses, record fields).A crosswalk table in the register entry; each row cites the external clause by number, never by text.
adoptThe ecosystem uses the external standard as-is for a function (ISO 3166, SPDX, ORCID, ROR).Validation of values against the external scheme.
extendNexus adds machine-readable, real-time or provenance elements the external standard lacks.The extension is a Nexus clause or field; the external standard is cited as the baseline.
gapNo external standard covers the concern; Nexus specifies it.The gap statement in the landscape study.
08Learn and apply

Where Cyber and digital risk is taught, worked on and run.

Risk Academy disciplines that teach Cyber and digital risk, with their courses; the GCRI Canada, The Global Risks Forum (GRF) and The Global Risks Alliance (GRA) subsites that carry those disciplines; and the Nexus Foundry systems the standards name. Mappings are proposed for review (Risk Academy standards map, 2026-10-17); a link says a page on the same subject exists, never an endorsement or a conformance statement; framework names in course titles are named and linked, never reproduced.

Risk Academy

Disciplines and courses

09Questions

Questions and answers.

Does a crosswalk make a cyber and digital risk artifact conformant to these standards?
No. A crosswalk is a mapping, not a conformance statement. A relation may be displayed only as clauses derived from the external standard and their current results, never as a compliance or certification statement unless the body entitled to decide has done so.
Why do some relations read compatibility profile (restricted)?
The standard is paywalled. Nexus Standards do not reproduce its text; a compatibility profile of it is built on simulated data and kept on restricted pages, and it is activated publicly only after an institutional arrangement with the issuing body is recorded (owner decision of 2026-10-16, counsel review pending).
Why are some entries unverified?
An unverified entry rests on a secondary source for at least one of name, body, version or year; NS14-R5 requires it to be shown as unverified.
Nexus Standards

Shape the standards for cyber and digital risk.

Every standard here is proposed. Changes enter as proposals under NS-13; conformance is shown by attestations under NS-11; nothing on this site is a certification, an approval or a readiness statement.

Nexus Standards documents CC BY 4.0 · tooling Apache-2.0 · counsel review pending (DEC-2026-10-16-NEXUS-STANDARDS-OPEN-LICENCE). External standards are named and linked under their own licences; a UNI (Unique Nexus Identifier) identifies, it never certifies. · Generated from the Nexus Standards corpus at commit 437ae044c5cb (2026-10-17); proposed and open.

Skip to toolbar