Maps the obligations and principles of the main AI governance instruments to Nexus model and system records and machine-readable clauses: the OECD AI Principles, the UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of AI, NIST AI RMF 1.0 and its generative AI profile, the EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), the Council of Europe Framework Convention on AI and the G7 Hiroshima Process, with ISO/IEC 42001 and 23894 named only. A section of the Digital, Cyber and AI subsite. Every artifact of the area carries a UNI (Unique Nexus Identifier), which identifies and never certifies.
Nexus Standards (2026). AI governance frameworks alignment: area brief, Digital, Cyber and AI (PROPOSED). https://nexustandards.com/digital-ai/ai-governance-frameworks-alignment/. Last reviewed 2026-10-17.
Files carry the credits and the licence line; they are generated in your browser and nothing is sent. Downloads need script.
The frameworks and mandates alignment section of Digital, Cyber and AI. Scope as the area context entry states it (PROPOSED).
In scope 4
Out of scope 3
Jurisdictions No jurisdiction note is recorded for this area yet; jurisdiction narrows what applies and never implies that a Nexus profile satisfies a law.
Indicator names and codes as their stewards publish them; values appear only from a governed GRIx source, never typed into a page.
Relations are register entries (NS-14), never conformance or equivalence statements; hover or focus a relation for its meaning. Names of standards bodies and their standards belong to their stewards and are used only to identify the documents; no text of an external standard is reproduced here.
crosswalk4
OECD Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence (OECD/LEGAL/0449)OECDproposed register rowRecommendation on the Ethics of Artificial IntelligenceUNESCOproposed register rowNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)NISTregister · nist-ai-rmfRegulation (EU) 2024/1689 (Artificial Intelligence Act)European Unionregister · eu-ai-actThe Nexus Standards the area context entry lists. Every one is proposed or specified; none is adopted by an authority.
Status proposed · 7 rules stated. Read NS-10
Status proposed · 6 rules stated. Read NS-11
Status proposed · 10 rules stated. Read NS-1
Each coupling names the mechanism that links this area to another; select a card on the canvas to trace it. Mechanisms are stated in the context bank (PROPOSED).
Fig.RUNNING marks the area you are reading; DONE an area in the same subsite, QUEUED an area elsewhere and GATE a subsite reached. Tags give reading order only, never a status. Design, not a record.
Sources the area reads or proposes. Delivery follows GRIx first; a source is shown live only after an owner decision admits it for public pages.
No legal register row admits any of these sources for live display on public pages yet, so nothing is read from them here. A register row that exists records the source for the governed GRIx path; admission for public pages is a separate owner decision.
OECD.AI national AI policies and initiatives databasepending admission
OECD · continuous
OECD terms and conditions (CC BY 4.0 unless otherwise stated)
build-time snapshotregister row exists
EUR-Lex Cellar (EU legal acts in machine-readable form)pending admission
Publications Office of the European Union · daily
Commission Decision 2011/833/EU reuse policy (free reuse with acknowledgement)
build-time snapshotproposed register row
Test suites, conformance statements and attestations per standard; no attestation is recorded yet, and none would certify.
Today · a draft in your browserMix standards and clauses into a profile draft with citations; YAML or JSON; nothing is submitted.
Today · in your browserPick a sector, hazard family, capability and artifact type; the registry routes the standards and says why.
A console computes from the registry and shows its reasons; it never decides, approves or certifies.
GCRI Canada decides under its own evidence rules whether AI model records and attestations are admissible; the crosswalk is not acceptance.
The Global Risks Forum (GRF) decides under its own rules whether AI governance work features in its programmes; alignment implies no recognition.
The Global Risks Alliance (GRA) decides capital readiness under its own criteria; obligation mapping only shows reviewers which AI duties a project has evidenced.
Each institution decides under its own rules what it reads as evidence; no pathway is an approval, a readiness statement or investment advice.
Closed or paywalled standards appear by name and link only; any compatibility profile of one is built on simulated data and kept on protected pages until an institutional arrangement with the issuing body is recorded. Nexus Standards is not affiliated with, endorsed by or certified by any standards body named here.
Maintain the obligation-level crosswalk and AI clause library, tracking implementing acts, codes of practice and harmonised standards as they are published.
No working group is chartered yet; a community may charter this one under NS-13 through a docket.
Hazards and threats 4
Sectors 0
No sector is listed for this area; it serves every sector through the areas it couples with.
Peer-reviewed sources and published statistics on the publishers' own domains, as the context entry cites them. No Risk Academy faculty pathway is linked to this area yet; one is linked when a faculty publishes a pathway that fits.
Risk Academy disciplines that teach AI governance frameworks alignment, with their courses; the GCRI Canada, The Global Risks Forum (GRF) and The Global Risks Alliance (GRA) subsites that carry those disciplines; and the Nexus Foundry systems the standards name. Mappings are proposed for review (Risk Academy standards map, 2026-10-17); a link says a page on the same subject exists, never an endorsement or a conformance statement; framework names in course titles are named and linked, never reproduced.
Propose a change, join the working group or name a source. Area entries are PROPOSED content for the Nexus Standards registry; a UNI identifies and never certifies, and nothing on this site is a certification, an approval or a readiness statement.
Nexus Standards documents CC BY 4.0 · tooling Apache-2.0 · counsel review pending (DEC-2026-10-16-NEXUS-STANDARDS-OPEN-LICENCE). External standards are named and linked under their own licences; a UNI (Unique Nexus Identifier) identifies, it never certifies. · Generated from the Nexus Standards corpus at commit 437ae044c5cb (2026-10-17); proposed and open.