Review and assurance cell
Public comment review cell
Reviews the comments on a draft and records how each one was resolved.
- To launch
- 6 members
- or more
- Roles
- 4
- each a credential
- Decides by
- Supermajority
- yours to change
- Joining
- By invitation
- set per cell
How it works
The operating model
People
- Panel chair
- Integrity contact
- Secretary
- Reviewer
How it decides
- Propose
- Discuss
- Supermajority
- Record and sign
- Conflict-of-interest recusal
- Veto, escalation and appeals
- Term limits
First work
- ProjectReview protocol
- ProjectFirst review round
- IssueOpen the register of interests
- IssueBuild the reviewer pool
- CallReviewers for the pool
Services
- Review hub
- Standards
- Forms
Start this cell
Public comment review cell
In detail
Purpose, roles, agreements and expertise
Purpose
Runs peer review panels and verifies methods, data and claims, with declared interests and recorded outcomes. Its records are proof of review, not certification.
Roles and what each does
| Role | What it does | Minimum |
|---|---|---|
| Panel chair | Chairs review panels and signs off their records. | 1 required |
| Integrity contact | Keeps the register of declared interests and handles recusals. | 1 required |
| Secretary | Keeps the records: minutes, decisions, the member list and the cell log. | 1 required |
| Reviewer | Reviews changes, drafts or claims before they are accepted. | 3 required |
The whole starter work programme
First projects
- Review protocol
- First review round
- Verification record
First issues
- Open the register of interests
- Build the reviewer pool
- Set the appeal route
Open calls
- Reviewers for the pool
Decision rule and agreements
Supermajority
At least a set fraction (two thirds, three fifths, three quarters) of a stated base.
- Cell charter Required The mission, scope, host, roles, governance model and how the cell closes.
- Membership agreement Required What members commit to, how they join and leave, and how credit is recorded.
- Data sharing agreement Optional What data the cell holds, who may use it, for what, and for how long.
- Intellectual property and open licence Required Who owns the outputs and the open licence they are published under.
- Code of conduct and safeguarding Required How members treat each other, how concerns are raised, and who acts on them.
Expertise and competence evidence
- Risk governance and institutions
- AI assurance and audit
- Science and technology studies
- Law and regulation
- Mathematics and applied mathematics
- Reviewer the cell's own field, at capability level 5 (Reviewed contribution) Reviewed contribution in the field under review.
Where it can form
GCRI (The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation)
Reports
The Global Risks Forum
Reports
The Global Risks Alliance
Reports
Nexus Standards
Trust, Verification and Assurance